Zaběhl jsem asi nejvíc ve svém životě, ale zatím to vypadá spíš na exitus než kondičku

Moderátor: PC
marcelo píše:narusitelpohody píše:reccol píše:Co treba plavani? To by melo bejt pro regeneraci a posileni celkovyho tela dobry ne? Aspon to kolem sebe porad slysim...
Pro regeneraci a posileni celkovy je dobry. Pro hubnutí je špatný.
Fakt- to si Ty?
pm píše:marcelo: jakmile se vyroji x novych uzivatelu, kteri se v prvnim prispevku hned zacnou do nekoho opirat, bud si jist, ze je neco shnileho ve state Danskem, aneb spooousta lidi tu na foru pise pod dvema ci vice nickama
fakt píše:marcelo píše:narusitelpohody píše:reccol píše:Co treba plavani? To by melo bejt pro regeneraci a posileni celkovyho tela dobry ne? Aspon to kolem sebe porad slysim...
Pro regeneraci a posileni celkovy je dobry. Pro hubnutí je špatný.
Fakt- to si Ty?
Ne.
Marcelo a ty to nejsi?
Women who run successfully for long periods of time are structured to run. They look very much like male runners; good female runners generally do not look like plus-size models and they are usually not tall. It's not a question of cause and effect; it's a question of natural selection. You can't run to get a runner's body. It's actually the reverse: You have to have a runner's body to survive running.
This is simple anatomy and physics. No matter how hard you try or how well you eat, you can't change your skeleton. The problem with most women and the activity of running comes down to the Q angle, which boils down to this: Wider hips make for narrowness at the knees. Q angle looks at the inclination of the femur relative to the pelvis. The increased Q angle
seen in most female athletes predisposes them to issues not found in male athletes. IT band issues, patella-femoral problems and problems with the plantar fascia can all be magnified by an increased Q angle.
This angle of hip to knee creates problems, and those are magnified by the number of steps taken. The average person gets about 1,500 foot strikes per mile; do the math on a five-mile run. Running produces forces in the area of two to five times bodyweight per foot contact. Do we
need more math than that?
Let's go back to our elite female runner. Look at her body. You will generally see two things: She has narrow hips and she has small breasts. There may be exceptions, but at the elite level I doubt it. One thought process may be, "Great, my hips and breasts will decrease in size if I run." The other view is more logical: Women with larger breasts and wider hips don't make good runners. It's the same reason there are no large gymnasts or figure skaters... physics. Bigger people rotate slower. Natural selection rules.
What happens when a normal-sized woman begins to run? She becomes a statistic. She becomes a physical therapy client as she tries to shovel you-know-what against the tide. Her wider hips cause her to develop foot or knee problems. Her larger bodyweight causes greater ground reaction forces. Greater ground reaction forces stress muscle and breast tissue. The end result might be hurt and saggy instead of lean.
This is not a popular position, but the bottom line is distance running is not good for most women. If your female clients want higher intensity exercise, give them intervals on a stationary bike. Schedule them for a spin class, put them on rowers or stairclimbers, but don't send them out for a run.
The reality is in women or men, endurance training can lead to overuse injury. My point is the female bodytype puts women at greater risk. Research has shown that six out of ten females who begin a distance running program will eventually be injured.
A study of Army recruits suggests greater amounts of running not only results in greater risks of injury, but in some instances may also impart no additional increase in fitness, a finding consistent with an earlier study of civilian runners.
On a typical women's basketball team, this translates to nine out of fifteen
athletes potentially injured by a program of distance running. Factor in the size and weight of the typical female collegiate basketball player and we can safely assume this number goes up, not down.
It is tough to look at something you enjoy and realize it may not be good for you. As you have this conversation with some of your female athletes, they may not be happy to hear it. The purpose of this section is to promote a cautious, thoughtful attitude, not to stop those who are running pain-free from continuing the activity.
However, it is clear the majority of the women who take up running do so as a weight-loss or weight-control method. Running may be a poor exercise choice for weight loss as a participant and even worse, a poor recommendation for your client if you are a trainer.
pm píše:narusitel pohody- jenze o tom je cely tento thread - ze neni behani jako behani, neni posilovani jako posilovani, ze nekdo je sto let za opicema a nekdo v obraze etc. vitej v r. 2010
jinak to tu zapadlo, ale naprosta vetsina divek a dam by behat vubec, ale vubec nemela (diky jistym evolucnim anatomickym rozdilum) - vzdycky je mi smutno, kdyz vidim nejakou holcinu, ktera chce se sebou neco delat, jak s walkmanem zpocena bezi po ulici, nozicky pekne do x, a jupiii, nicime si kolinka, kloktame si kycle, yahooo
narusitelpohody píše:Doba sto let za opicema mi byla o dost sympatičtější. Bez následků jako jsou skoliózy, zborcený klenby, celodenní dřepění atd., tělo je stvořený k pohybu, když se nepohybuje - onemocní. Dneska je to často tak, že kdo sportuje je na tom hůř než ten kdo nic nedělá. Proč asi.
Pokud opravdu ovládáš moderní pohybové zásady a nejnovější poznatky z roku 2010 je to super. Budu se tě hodně ptát.
Nerozumím jak to myslíš s těma ženskýma a co jsou evolucni anatomicky rozdily.
ukropcany píše:Hehe... ja by som zas povedal, že na chudnutie je posilka základ, pretože čisto aeróbnou záťažou sa síce chudne, ale svaly idú totálne do kelu. Posilka (posilovanie) spraví to, že väčší podiel svalov na hmotnosti spaľuje viac energie aj v kľudovom režime = "chudne aj keď práve nič nerobí". Ďalší dôvod posilovania je to, že postavu formujú svaly, takže aj keď by mala kilečko navyše, tak svaly sa postarajú aspoň o dobrý tvar, nie "knédl". Zas posilovaním sa tuku človek nezbaví, takže by som videl podľa seba posilovanie a aero 1:1
Clarke píše:... jenže holky o tomhle nikdy nepřesvědčíš, ty ti prostě železa tahat nepůjdou, ani kdyby jim už zadek neprošel futrama. Alespoň mě se to nikdy nepovedlo. Místo toho se raději potí na aerobiku se všemi již zmíněnými negativy.
Btw, viděli jste někdy nějakou holku alespoň ten aerobik cvičit s měřičem tepový frekvence? Já tedy ne. Těžko se pak divit, že jim "nic" nezabírá.
DrGlock píše:Vědecky se dá okecat cokoliv, ale podobní "vědci", kteří tvrdí že běhání není dobré pro ženy, si donedávna mysleli, že na běhání jsou vhodné boty s měkkou podrážkou. A jak se přitom sekli. Stačí se podívat kolem sebe, kolik lidí si nese následky tohoto omylu v podobě zničených nohou, kolen, atd.
Zpět na posilování, relaxace, zdraví, duchovní rozvoj
Uživatelé procházející toto fórum: Žádní registrovaní uživatelé a 0 návštevníků